Papua New Guinea vs Uruguay: Men's universal right to vote

Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Uruguay
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.60.81182519252025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

Across all 142 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Uruguay Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0.2 0.2 Uruguay
1920s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1930s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1940s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1950s 0.9 1 0.1 Uruguay
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Papua New Guinea or Uruguay?
Papua New Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Uruguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Papua New Guinea and Uruguay?
0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uruguay?
142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
How do Papua New Guinea and Uruguay rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.