Papua New Guinea vs Tunisia: Men's universal right to vote
Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Tunisia
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Tunisia rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 142 shared years of data; in 1884 it was Tunisia ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.5 | Papua New Guinea |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Papua New Guinea or Tunisia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Papua New Guinea and Tunisia?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Tunisia?
- 142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Tunisia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.