Papua New Guinea vs Tanzania: Men's universal right to vote
Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Tanzania
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Tanzania
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 112 shared years of data; in 1914 it was Tanzania ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Papua New Guinea |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | Papua New Guinea |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Papua New Guinea or Tanzania?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Papua New Guinea and Tanzania?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Tanzania?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Tanzania rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.