North Macedonia vs Sri Lanka: Men's universal right to vote

North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 197 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 1 0 1 North Macedonia
1930s 1 0.8 0.2 North Macedonia
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, North Macedonia or Sri Lanka?
North Macedonia, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between North Macedonia and Sri Lanka?
0, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sri Lanka?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and Sri Lanka rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.