North Macedonia vs Singapore: Men's universal right to vote
North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Singapore
1
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- North Macedonia
- Singapore
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 1 against 1 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Singapore ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 197 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | North Macedonia |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | North Macedonia |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | North Macedonia |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | North Macedonia |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, North Macedonia or Singapore?
- North Macedonia, at 1 against 1 in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between North Macedonia and Singapore?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Singapore?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do North Macedonia and Singapore rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- North Macedonia ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.