Nicaragua vs Solomon Islands: Men's universal right to vote
Nicaragua
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Nicaragua
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 133 shared years of data; in 1893 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1900s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Nicaragua or Solomon Islands?
- Nicaragua, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Nicaragua and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Solomon Islands?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and Solomon Islands rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Nicaragua ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.