Nicaragua vs San Marino: Men's universal right to vote

Nicaragua
1
in 2025
San Marino
1
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Nicaragua
  • San Marino
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 1 against 1 in San Marino, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 188 shared years of data; in 1838 it was San Marino ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua San Marino Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0.7 0 0.7 Nicaragua
1900s 1 0.1 0.9 Nicaragua
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Nicaragua or San Marino?
Nicaragua, at 1 against 1 in San Marino as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Nicaragua and San Marino?
0, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and San Marino?
188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
How do Nicaragua and San Marino rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Nicaragua ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.