New Zealand vs Taiwan: Men's universal right to vote

New Zealand
1
in 2025
Taiwan
1
in 2025
New Zealand rank
1st
Taiwan rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • New Zealand
  • Taiwan
00.20.40.60.81184119332025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1 against 1 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 131 shared years of data; in 1895 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Taiwan Difference Ahead
1890s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1900s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1910s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1920s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1930s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1940s 1 0.3 0.7 New Zealand
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, New Zealand or Taiwan?
New Zealand, at 1 against 1 in Taiwan as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between New Zealand and Taiwan?
0, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Taiwan?
131 years are reported by both, from 1895 to 2025.
How do New Zealand and Taiwan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
New Zealand ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.