Nauru vs Venezuela: Men's universal right to vote

Nauru
1
in 2025
Venezuela
1
in 2025
Nauru rank
1st
Venezuela rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Nauru
  • Venezuela
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 1 against 1 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.

Across all 138 years both countries report, Venezuela has been ahead every year.

Nauru ranks 1st and Venezuela ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Venezuela Difference Ahead
1880s 0 1 1 Venezuela
1890s 0 1 1 Venezuela
1900s 0 1 1 Venezuela
1910s 0 1 1 Venezuela
1920s 0 1 1 Venezuela
1930s 0 0.6 0.6 Venezuela
1940s 0 0.3 0.3 Venezuela
1950s 0.9 1 0.1 Venezuela
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Nauru or Venezuela?
Nauru, at 1 against 1 in Venezuela as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Nauru and Venezuela?
0, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Venezuela?
138 years are reported by both, from 1888 to 2025.
How do Nauru and Venezuela rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Nauru ranks 1st and Venezuela ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.