Nauru vs San Marino: Men's universal right to vote

Nauru
1
in 2025
San Marino
1
in 2025
Nauru rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Nauru
  • San Marino
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 1 against 1 in San Marino, a difference of 0.

Across all 138 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

Nauru ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru San Marino Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0.1 0.1 San Marino
1910s 0 1 1 San Marino
1920s 0 1 1 San Marino
1930s 0 1 1 San Marino
1940s 0 1 1 San Marino
1950s 0.9 1 0.1 San Marino
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Nauru or San Marino?
Nauru, at 1 against 1 in San Marino as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Nauru and San Marino?
0, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and San Marino?
138 years are reported by both, from 1888 to 2025.
How do Nauru and San Marino rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Nauru ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.