Mongolia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Men's universal right to vote
Mongolia
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Mongolia rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Mongolia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Mongolia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Mongolia |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mongolia |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Mongolia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Mongolia, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.