Moldova vs Trinidad and Tobago: Men's universal right to vote
Moldova
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Moldova rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Moldova
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 117 shared years of data; in 1889 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Moldova ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Moldova |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Moldova |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Moldova or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Moldova, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Moldova and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 117 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Moldova ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.