Micronesia (country) vs Uzbekistan: Men's universal right to vote

Micronesia (country)
1
in 2025
Uzbekistan
1
in 2025
Micronesia (country) rank
1st
Uzbekistan rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Uzbekistan
00.20.40.60.81186519452025

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 79 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1940s 0 1 1 Uzbekistan
1950s 0 1 1 Uzbekistan
1960s 0.8 1 0.2 Uzbekistan
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Micronesia (country) or Uzbekistan?
Micronesia (country), at 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Micronesia (country) and Uzbekistan?
0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Uzbekistan?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Micronesia (country) and Uzbekistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.