Marshall Islands vs Western Sahara: Men's universal right to vote
Marshall Islands
1
in 2025
Western Sahara
1
in 2025
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Western Sahara rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Marshall Islands
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Marshall Islands |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Marshall Islands |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Marshall Islands |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Marshall Islands |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Marshall Islands or Western Sahara?
- Marshall Islands, at 1 against 1 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Marshall Islands and Western Sahara?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Western Sahara?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
- How do Marshall Islands and Western Sahara rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.