Marshall Islands vs Slovakia: Men's universal right to vote

Marshall Islands
1
in 2025
Slovakia
1
in 2025
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Slovakia rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Marshall Islands
  • Slovakia
00.20.40.60.81187519502025

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.

Across all 108 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.

Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Slovakia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Marshall Islands Slovakia Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 1 1 Slovakia
1930s 0 1 1 Slovakia
1940s 0 1 1 Slovakia
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Marshall Islands or Slovakia?
Marshall Islands, at 1 against 1 in Slovakia as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Marshall Islands and Slovakia?
0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Slovakia?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Marshall Islands and Slovakia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Slovakia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.