Luxembourg vs Western Sahara: Men's universal right to vote

Luxembourg
1
in 2025
Western Sahara
1
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
1st
Western Sahara rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Western Sahara
00.20.40.60.81181519202025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 1 against 1 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1960s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
1970s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
1980s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
1990s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
2000s 1 0.2 0.8 Luxembourg
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Luxembourg or Western Sahara?
Luxembourg, at 1 against 1 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Luxembourg and Western Sahara?
0, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Western Sahara?
63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Western Sahara rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.