Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Men's universal right to vote

Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Norway
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Norway rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Norway
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1 against 1 in Norway, a difference of 0.

Across all 158 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Norway ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Norway Difference Ahead
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0.2 0.2 Norway
1900s 0.5 1 0.5 Norway
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Norway?
Kyrgyzstan, at 1 against 1 in Norway as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Norway rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Norway ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.