Kyrgyz Republic vs North Macedonia: Men's universal right to vote
Kyrgyz Republic
1
in 2025
North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Kyrgyz Republic rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Kyrgyz Republic
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Kyrgyz Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
Kyrgyz Republic ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Kyrgyz Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyz Republic | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Kyrgyz Republic or North Macedonia?
- Kyrgyz Republic, at 1 against 1 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Kyrgyz Republic and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyz Republic and North Macedonia?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyz Republic and North Macedonia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Kyrgyz Republic ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.