Kyrgyzstan vs Myanmar: Men's universal right to vote
Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Myanmar
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Myanmar rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Myanmar
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1 against 1 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 158 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Myanmar ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Myanmar?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1 against 1 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.