Kyrgyzstan vs Mozambique: Men's universal right to vote

Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Mozambique
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Mozambique rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mozambique
00.20.40.60.81186819462025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1 against 1 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1893 it was Mozambique ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Mozambique ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Mozambique Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0.5 0 0.5 Kyrgyzstan
1910s 1 0 1 Kyrgyzstan
1920s 1 0 1 Kyrgyzstan
1930s 1 0 1 Kyrgyzstan
1940s 1 0 1 Kyrgyzstan
1950s 1 0 1 Kyrgyzstan
1960s 1 0 1 Kyrgyzstan
1970s 1 0.5 0.5 Kyrgyzstan
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Mozambique?
Kyrgyzstan, at 1 against 1 in Mozambique as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique?
0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique?
133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Mozambique ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.