Kiribati vs New Zealand: Men's universal right to vote
Kiribati
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Kiribati rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Kiribati
- New Zealand
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 134 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Kiribati or New Zealand?
- Kiribati, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Kiribati and New Zealand?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and New Zealand?
- 134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and New Zealand rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Kiribati ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.