Kazakhstan vs Western Sahara: Men's universal right to vote

Kazakhstan
1
in 2025
Western Sahara
1
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
1st
Western Sahara rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Western Sahara
00.20.40.60.81180019122025

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 1 against 1 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1960s 1 0 1 Kazakhstan
1970s 1 0 1 Kazakhstan
1980s 1 0 1 Kazakhstan
1990s 1 0 1 Kazakhstan
2000s 1 0.2 0.8 Kazakhstan
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Kazakhstan or Western Sahara?
Kazakhstan, at 1 against 1 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Kazakhstan and Western Sahara?
0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Western Sahara?
63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do Kazakhstan and Western Sahara rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Kazakhstan ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.