Kazakhstan vs Sudan: Men's universal right to vote

Kazakhstan
1
in 2025
Sudan
1
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
1st
Sudan rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Sudan
00.20.40.60.81180019122025

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 1 against 1 in Sudan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 127 shared years of data; in 1899 it was Sudan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Sudan Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0.5 0 0.5 Kazakhstan
1910s 1 0 1 Kazakhstan
1920s 1 0 1 Kazakhstan
1930s 1 0 1 Kazakhstan
1940s 1 0 1 Kazakhstan
1950s 1 0.7 0.3 Kazakhstan
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Kazakhstan or Sudan?
Kazakhstan, at 1 against 1 in Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Kazakhstan and Sudan?
0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan?
127 years are reported by both, from 1899 to 2025.
How do Kazakhstan and Sudan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Kazakhstan ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.