Japan vs Kyrgyzstan: Men's universal right to vote

Japan
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Japan rank
1st
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Japan
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.

Across all 158 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0.5 0.5 Kyrgyzstan
1910s 0 1 1 Kyrgyzstan
1920s 0.5 1 0.5 Kyrgyzstan
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Japan or Kyrgyzstan?
Japan, at 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Japan and Kyrgyzstan?
0, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kyrgyzstan?
158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
How do Japan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Japan ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.