Jamaica vs Turkmenistan: Men's universal right to vote

Jamaica
1
in 2025
Turkmenistan
1
in 2025
Jamaica rank
1st
Turkmenistan rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Jamaica
  • Turkmenistan
00.20.40.60.81180019122025

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1 against 1 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 142 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 1st and Turkmenistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0.5 0.5 Turkmenistan
1910s 0 1 1 Turkmenistan
1920s 0 1 1 Turkmenistan
1930s 0 1 1 Turkmenistan
1940s 0.6 1 0.4 Turkmenistan
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Jamaica or Turkmenistan?
Jamaica, at 1 against 1 in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Jamaica and Turkmenistan?
0, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Turkmenistan?
142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Turkmenistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Jamaica ranks 1st and Turkmenistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.