Ireland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Men's universal right to vote

Ireland
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Ireland rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Ireland
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.60.81188919572025

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1910s 1 0 1 Ireland
1920s 1 0 1 Ireland
1930s 1 0 1 Ireland
1940s 1 0.4 0.6 Ireland
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Ireland or Trinidad and Tobago?
Ireland, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago?
0, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Ireland ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.