Indonesia vs Nepal: Men's universal right to vote

Indonesia
1
in 2025
Nepal
1
in 2025
Indonesia rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Indonesia
  • Nepal
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 1 against 1 in Nepal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 226 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Nepal ahead.

Indonesia ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 23 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Nepal Difference Ahead
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.7 0.2 0.5 Indonesia
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Indonesia or Nepal?
Indonesia, at 1 against 1 in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Indonesia and Nepal?
0, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nepal?
226 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2025.
How do Indonesia and Nepal rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Indonesia ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.