Haiti vs Papua New Guinea: Men's universal right to vote

Haiti
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Haiti rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Haiti
  • Papua New Guinea
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 1 against 1 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 142 shared years of data; in 1884 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Haiti ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 1 0.9 0.1 Haiti
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Haiti or Papua New Guinea?
Haiti, at 1 against 1 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Haiti and Papua New Guinea?
0, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Papua New Guinea?
142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
How do Haiti and Papua New Guinea rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Haiti ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.