Guinea-Bissau vs Tajikistan: Men's universal right to vote
Guinea-Bissau
1
in 2025
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1 against 1 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 134 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Tajikistan |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1970s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Tajikistan |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Guinea-Bissau or Tajikistan?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1 against 1 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Guinea-Bissau and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tajikistan?
- 134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Tajikistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.