France vs New Zealand: Men's universal right to vote

France
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
France rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • France
  • New Zealand
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

France currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 185 shared years of data; in 1841 it was New Zealand ahead.

France ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France New Zealand Difference Ahead
1840s 0.2222 0 0.2222 France
1850s 0.9 0 0.9 France
1860s 1 0 1 France
1870s 1 0.1 0.9 France
1880s 1 1 0 β€”
1890s 1 1 0 β€”
1900s 1 1 0 β€”
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, France or New Zealand?
France, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between France and New Zealand?
0, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and New Zealand?
185 years are reported by both, from 1841 to 2025.
How do France and New Zealand rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
France ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.