Fiji vs New Zealand: Men's universal right to vote
Fiji
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Fiji rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Fiji
- New Zealand
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 152 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0 | 0.1667 | 0.1667 | New Zealand |
| 1880s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Fiji or New Zealand?
- Fiji, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Fiji and New Zealand?
- 0, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and New Zealand?
- 152 years are reported by both, from 1874 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and New Zealand rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Fiji ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.