Egypt vs Nicaragua: Men's universal right to vote
Egypt
1
in 2025
Nicaragua
1
in 2025
Egypt rank
1st
Nicaragua rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Egypt
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 1 against 1 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.
Across all 188 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 1st and Nicaragua ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | Nicaragua |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 1920s | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | Nicaragua |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Egypt or Nicaragua?
- Egypt, at 1 against 1 in Nicaragua as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Egypt and Nicaragua?
- 0, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Nicaragua?
- 188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Nicaragua rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Egypt ranks 1st and Nicaragua ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.