Dominica vs United States: Men's universal right to vote

Dominica
1
in 2025
United States
1
in 2025
Dominica rank
1st
United States rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Dominica
  • United States
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 1 against 1 in United States, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 102 shared years of data; in 1924 it was United States ahead.

Dominica ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica United States Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.9 0 0.9 Dominica
1960s 1 0.5 0.5 Dominica
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Dominica or United States?
Dominica, at 1 against 1 in United States as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Dominica and United States?
0, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and United States?
102 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2025.
How do Dominica and United States rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Dominica ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.