Djibouti vs United Kingdom: Men's universal right to vote
Djibouti
1
in 2025
United Kingdom
1
in 2025
Djibouti rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Djibouti
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 1 against 1 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
Across all 141 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 197 regions.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | United Kingdom |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | United Kingdom |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Djibouti or United Kingdom?
- Djibouti, at 1 against 1 in United Kingdom as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Djibouti and United Kingdom?
- 0, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and United Kingdom?
- 141 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and United Kingdom rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 197 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.