Djibouti vs Switzerland: Men's universal right to vote

Djibouti
1
in 2025
Switzerland
1
in 2025
Djibouti rank
1st
Switzerland rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Djibouti
  • Switzerland
00.20.40.60.81179819112025

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 1 against 1 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.

Across all 141 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 1st of 197 regions.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Switzerland Difference Ahead
1880s 0 1 1 Switzerland
1890s 0 1 1 Switzerland
1900s 0 1 1 Switzerland
1910s 0 1 1 Switzerland
1920s 0 1 1 Switzerland
1930s 0 1 1 Switzerland
1940s 0 1 1 Switzerland
1950s 0.3 1 0.7 Switzerland
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Djibouti or Switzerland?
Djibouti, at 1 against 1 in Switzerland as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Djibouti and Switzerland?
0, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Switzerland?
141 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
How do Djibouti and Switzerland rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Djibouti ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 1st of 197 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.