Cuba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Men's universal right to vote
Cuba
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Cuba rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Cuba
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 137 shared years of data; in 1889 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Cuba ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Cuba |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Cuba |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Cuba |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cuba or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Cuba, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 137 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Cuba ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.