Croatia vs Papua New Guinea: Men's universal right to vote

Croatia
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Croatia
  • Papua New Guinea
00.20.40.60.81188419542025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1 against 1 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Croatia ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 1 0 1 Croatia
1930s 1 0 1 Croatia
1940s 1 0 1 Croatia
1950s 1 0.9 0.1 Croatia
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Croatia or Papua New Guinea?
Croatia, at 1 against 1 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Croatia and Papua New Guinea?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Papua New Guinea?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Croatia ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.