Croatia vs Dominican Republic: Men's universal right to vote

Croatia
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
Dominican Republic rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Croatia
  • Dominican Republic
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1 against 1 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.

Across all 108 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 1st and Dominican Republic ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1910s 0 1 1 Dominican Republic
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Croatia or Dominican Republic?
Croatia, at 1 against 1 in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Croatia and Dominican Republic?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Dominican Republic?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Dominican Republic rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Croatia ranks 1st and Dominican Republic ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.