Cote d'Ivoire vs East Timor: Men's universal right to vote
Cote d'Ivoire
1
in 2025
East Timor
1
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
East Timor rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- East Timor
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 1 against 1 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
Across all 133 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 197 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | East Timor |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cote d'Ivoire or East Timor?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 1 against 1 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cote d'Ivoire and East Timor?
- 0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and East Timor?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and East Timor rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.