Cote d'Ivoire vs Tanzania: Men's universal right to vote

Cote d'Ivoire
1
in 2025
Tanzania
1
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Tanzania
00.20.40.60.81189319592025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 1 against 1 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 112 shared years of data; in 1914 it was Tanzania ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Tanzania Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.3 0 0.3 Cote d'Ivoire
1960s 1 0.7 0.3 Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cote d'Ivoire or Tanzania?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 1 against 1 in Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania?
0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania?
112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.