Cote d'Ivoire vs Slovenia: Men's universal right to vote

Cote d'Ivoire
1
in 2025
Slovenia
1
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
Slovenia rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Slovenia
00.20.40.60.81189319592025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 1 against 1 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.

Across all 108 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Slovenia Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 1 1 Slovenia
1930s 0 1 1 Slovenia
1940s 0 1 1 Slovenia
1950s 0.3 1 0.7 Slovenia
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cote d'Ivoire or Slovenia?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 1 against 1 in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cote d'Ivoire and Slovenia?
0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Slovenia?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Slovenia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.