Cote d'Ivoire vs Singapore: Men's universal right to vote
Cote d'Ivoire
1
in 2025
Singapore
1
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Singapore
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 1 against 1 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1893 it was Singapore ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cote d'Ivoire or Singapore?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 1 against 1 in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cote d'Ivoire and Singapore?
- 0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Singapore?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Singapore rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.