Costa Rica vs Kiribati: Men's universal right to vote

Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Kiribati
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Kiribati rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Kiribati
00.20.40.60.81183819312025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 134 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Kiribati ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 1st and Kiribati ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Kiribati Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0.1 0 0.1 Costa Rica
1950s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1960s 1 0.6 0.4 Costa Rica
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Costa Rica or Kiribati?
Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Kiribati as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Costa Rica and Kiribati?
0, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kiribati?
134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Kiribati rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Kiribati ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.