Costa Rica vs Italy: Men's universal right to vote

Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Italy
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Italy rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Italy
00.20.40.60.81183819312025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Italy, a difference of 0.

Across all 165 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 1st and Italy ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Italy Difference Ahead
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0.7 0.7 Italy
1920s 0 1 1 Italy
1930s 0 1 1 Italy
1940s 0.1 1 0.9 Italy
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Costa Rica or Italy?
Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Italy as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Costa Rica and Italy?
0, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Italy?
165 years are reported by both, from 1861 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Italy rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Italy ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.