Costa Rica vs Haiti: Men's universal right to vote
Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Haiti
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Haiti rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Costa Rica
- Haiti
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Haiti, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 188 shared years of data; in 1838 it was Haiti ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Haiti ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Costa Rica |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Costa Rica or Haiti?
- Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Haiti as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Costa Rica and Haiti?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Haiti?
- 188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Haiti rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Costa Rica ranks 1st and Haiti ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.