Colombia vs Kyrgyzstan: Men's universal right to vote
Colombia
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Colombia rank
1st
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Colombia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 158 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 17 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Colombia |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1930s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Colombia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Colombia, at 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Colombia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Colombia ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.