Central African Republic vs Pakistan: Men's universal right to vote

Central African Republic
1
in 2025
Pakistan
1
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
1st
Pakistan rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Pakistan
00.20.40.60.81189419592025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 79 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Pakistan Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.3 0.4 0.1 Pakistan
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Central African Republic or Pakistan?
Central African Republic, at 1 against 1 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Central African Republic and Pakistan?
0, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Pakistan?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Pakistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Central African Republic ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.