Central African Republic vs Dominica: Men's universal right to vote
Central African Republic
1
in 2025
Dominica
1
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
1st
Dominica rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Central African Republic
- Dominica
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Dominica, a difference of 0.
Across all 102 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 1st and Dominica ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | Dominica |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Central African Republic or Dominica?
- Central African Republic, at 1 against 1 in Dominica as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Central African Republic and Dominica?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Dominica?
- 102 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Dominica rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Central African Republic ranks 1st and Dominica ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.