Cambodia vs Uzbekistan: Men's universal right to vote
Cambodia
1
in 2025
Uzbekistan
1
in 2025
Cambodia rank
1st
Uzbekistan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Cambodia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 151 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Uzbekistan |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1950s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Uzbekistan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cambodia or Uzbekistan?
- Cambodia, at 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cambodia and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Uzbekistan?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1865 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Uzbekistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Cambodia ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.