Burkina Faso vs Myanmar: Men's universal right to vote

Burkina Faso
1
in 2025
Myanmar
1
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
1st
Myanmar rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Myanmar
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 1 against 1 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.

Across all 92 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Myanmar Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0.6667 0.6667 Myanmar
1950s 0.3 1 0.7 Myanmar
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Burkina Faso or Myanmar?
Burkina Faso, at 1 against 1 in Myanmar as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Burkina Faso and Myanmar?
0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Myanmar?
92 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Myanmar rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.